“Dubious Reasons for Microbiological Sampling”

We would like to think that every sample that comes into the microbiological laboratory is of great importance and has been taken for the right reasons. However having been in the business for several years now I know that this is not always the case. Here are some of the dubious reasons that I have come across for taking microbiological samples (most of which can of course can be applied to laboratory investigations in general)

  • To make the patient feel that something useful has come from the consultation: Particularly common in the General Practice setting. The GP may use either a prescription or a laboratory test to demonstrate that he is doing something useful for the patient. Particularly common where the patient is required to pay a fee for the consultation.
  •  Fear: The clinician may order the investigation as there is a fear that he/she may get into trouble for missing something strange or unusual. Also in the hospital setting a junior doctor may order a laboratory test “just in case” the consultant is looking for the result on the ward round.
  •  As a test of cure: Common particularly with regards to urine samples. However laboratory test of cures only very rarely indicated. Most of the time the disappearance of symptoms from the patient is an adequate test of cure.
  •  Temptation: Sometimes wound lesions “are just asking” for a swab to be put into them! A burst boil, a discharging ear, a non-healing venous ulcer. Sometimes the temptation to sample is just too much…
  •  Self-Justification: The clinician may start the patient on empirical treatment and then sample in order to justify the treatment, even though in many cases there is little chance of the sample result actually changing the treatment.
  •  Patient request: The patient who presents to the clinician and demands for a urine sample or similar to be sent to the lab even though the doctor may not think the investigation is necessary and communication of this fact may be more hastle than it’s worth.

There may of course be other reasons which I have not thought of. I suspect however the above list may well make up a significant proportion of the total number of specimens coming into a clinical microbiology department.

If your laboratory is funded on a “fee per test” basis, then you may not care why the sample has been taken. “The more tests the better” for this type of set-up.

However if your laboratory is funded on a capped budget” (probably the majority of labs) then you might want to look more closely at the factors influencing testing to ensure that the most important reason is being considered first and foremost; “Will the result of this test/swab/urine etc have a significant chance of affecting the ongoing management of the patient…”


2 thoughts on ““Dubious Reasons for Microbiological Sampling”

  1. Some other recent ones we ahve come across are:
    1. seology for “proof of vaccination” (including BCG and polio) and
    2. clearance of faecal parasites and bacteria (particularly Blastocystis and Salmonella) even when faeces is well ‘formed’

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *